|
Sign up now, Make more friends, Enjoy with more features, Let you easily Fun Community.
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
We lost in legend rank, something like 7-25.
I checked my teamates and they were:
Leomord, 3 matches 0% win rate. He had 900 games in total, mostly brawl.
Harith, 20 matches 50% win rate. He had 700 games in total, mostly brawl.
I checked the enemy team, they all had more than 2000 games and they played their main heros.
So do you think this is fair?? Should that Harith and Leomord should be punished??
I wrote a post about AFK, in my opinion they should be banned 1 day ONLY from rank the first time they are AFK. 1 week the second time and the third time they should be banned for the rest of the season, ONLY in rank, so they can still play classic brawl and the other modes.
Now im asking you all what kind of punishments you consider fair for these poor performance intentional feeders.
I suggest not allowing playing any hero unless you have more than 100 games in classic. Trying new heros in rank is just disrespecful for the other 4 teammats.
Punishment?? maybe not banned from rank, but losing more credits (which banns you from rank).
If the system gives you a 3.0 final score, that should definetely be a good 20 credits punishment (you go to 90 which allows you to play rank again).
If you get between 3.1 and 4.0 you lose 10 credits.
I have 2000 games with jhonson 51% win rate and im starting kufra now, 200 games with 47% win rate. People in draft always complain about my low win rate with khufra, i tell them im really good, check my history after the game.
I end up being MVP, something like 8 kills, dead 2, support 10, between 20 and 30% damage, and between 40% to 50% tanking.
meh...
|
|